Misogyny of The Left

One would expect the left to have some manner of propriety in their professional publications, but we are speaking of liberals. I came across an article over at Michelle Malkin’s site and found a piece regarding one Mark Morford who is a columnist at the San Francisco Gate newspaper. Mr. Morford wrote an article regarding his friend who is “…brash and funny and who spoke her mind without the slightest reservation, and who could drink and think and opine with the strongest of men…” and her perplexing admiration of Laura Bush.

Mr. Morford is perplexed by this because he views Mrs. Bush as:

“…out on tour recently with her twin Styrofoam peanut daughters, Jenna and Barbara, promoting a new children’s book they all apparently, and yeah right, wrote together and isn’t that sweet. There is Laura, looking exactly as she has looked for the past eight insufferable years. Prim, a bit glassy, reserved, her hair some sort of ironclad helmet of awkward architecture, the very epitome of nice, meek, domestic Republican female, not making the slightest wave and hoping no one really notices because, well, she’s just a woman.”

Notice how Mr. Morford transfers his own hatred of women to Mrs. Bush in the guise of criticism. By implication he is stating that women like Mrs. Bush are dysfunctional and somehow defective. As such, her life is pointless and her achievements are meaningless. That a business such as the San Francisco Gate would allow him to publish this material is beyond understanding. That is, until you recall that they themselves are liberals and agree with his assessment. This distorted view of reality is what perplexes conservatives. It is as if the liberals have said that they reject reality and substitute their own. Perhaps this is simply the legacy of the sixties in that the drug induced torpor of their parents created today’s skewed version of the world.

Regardless, Mr. Morford has no idea of the hornet’s nest he has so brazenly disturbed. Conservative women are prim and proper ladies until you have gotten on their bad side. When angered, these women would give a Spartan soldier pause. A fact that you are no doubt being introduced to as I write, since Mrs. Malkin included your papers contact information in her article. In order to preclude the inevitable search for said information at Mrs. Malkin’s page I have included it below:

Reader representative: If you have comments on The Chronicle’s coverage, standards or accuracy, please call Dick Rogers, the readers’ representative, at (415) 777-7870. Written comments can be e-mailed to readerrep@sfchronicle.com, faxed to (415) 442-1847, or addressed to Readers’ Representative, c/o San Francisco Chronicle, 901 Mission St., San Francisco, CA 94103. For information on delivery, billing or how to become a subscriber, call (800) 281-2476.

Letters to the Editor should be addressed to letters@sfchronicle.com. Due to space considerations, only letters of less than 250 words will be considered for publication. Please provide your name and telephone number along with your letter. You will be called if your letter is being considered for publication.

God help you Mr. Morford.

Racism in America

Race relations have been the hot topic of conversation now for several weeks due to the “outing” of Jeremiah Wright’s preaching. However, I believe that if Barrack Obama had not been running for president, Wright’s views would not even have been noticed. However, this problem has been festering in the United States for some time now and I believe that we are now dealing with an infection that has abscessed and in order to heal we will need to lance it. To begin with, I am a Caucasian. One may wonder what experience a white person has had with racism in order to give a commentary upon that subject and I consider that a valid question. Truth be told, I have had a great deal of experience with being on the receiving end of racism.

I attended one of the worst high schools in Richmond, Virginia. I was bussed to school from my home to a poor section of town to attend John F. Kennedy High School. The school was located smack dab in the middle of the projects. At the time, Richmond was the murder capitol of the nation and drugs were the primary cause of our reputation for violence. Additionally, the projects surrounding the school were known to be one of the deadliest in town. It was there that a thirteen year old white kid and the remaining students of the schools white population were deposited every morning during the week. The remaining student population was 98% black, with many of these students living in the surrounding projects.

While attending this school I was called a honky, white cracker, cracker, white bread, and whitey. There were several fights to teach whitey his place and the girls were not spared violence either. The school administration ignored the racial aspects of these problems until somebody nearly died. A friend of mine was nearly beaten to death. My friend was white and his assailant was black. The school janitor found him lying in a pool of his own blood on the floor of the boy’s bathroom at 4:30 a.m. and called for an ambulance. When you have to survive in an environment like that, you develop behaviors that keep you from being noticed. So I have some knowledge of experiencing bad treatment just for the color of your skin. It is just that the racial roles were reversed, I was the victim and the bigot had black skin.

As I grew older and graduated from high school, I came face to face with racism again. I had applied for a position as an automotive technician at the Sears Auto Center. The move would have been a lateral one because I was already employed as a sales associate in Hardware. I wasn’t successful in getting the job, but having a friend who worked in the personnel office has its benefits. I asked her what I could do in the future to improve my chances of employment with the Auto Center. She swore me to secrecy and when I had given my word, she revealed that there was nothing I could have done. Sears was never going to hire a white person for that position because there were too many whites employed at the Auto Center already. She told me that I was more qualified than the black female that they had hired, but there was nothing that could be done because of racial quotas. I was angry, but there was nothing that I could do if I were to honor my word, but it rankled me that the only reason that I was not hired was due to the color of my skin. Once such a thing has happened, it opens your eyes to the injustices of racism. While my previous high school experience was not pleasant, I attributed it to the actions of thugs and criminals. I had no idea that being white could prevent you from being employed. It was a rude awakening.

While we still have racism in white America, there is also racism in black America. We hear black preachers talking about liberation gospel and how whitey has never repented for his treatment of the black man, how the government created HIV to destroy the black population, how the crackers created gangster rap to kill black people, and how Notorious B.I.G. and Tupac Shuker were the next great black leaders, but they weren’t smart enough to dodge whitey’s plot to get them to kill one another. We also hear Mayor Ray Nagin speaking of a chocolate city where New Orleans “will be a majority African-American city. It's the way God wants it to be.” To tell you the truth, the only difference between the black people who subscribe to this garbage and David Duke, is the color of their skin.

Yet society constantly denies that there is racism anywhere, but in white America. However, hatred is an emotion that all human beings have. Racism is based upon the human desire to elevate the self while denying status to another for an arbitrary reason and this response is fueled by hatred. In the case of black America, they wish to elevate themselves while they throw whitey under the bus while being cheered on by people like Jeremiah Wright, who tells them that it is God’s will that they do so. Yet any criticism of the black community only engenders attack regardless of race.

Bill Cosby was sitting on a panel hosted by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation in Washington D.C. and was speaking about parenting skills. The Washington Post reported, “Cosby, whose recent scathing observations of the parenting skills and personal values of low-income black people have earned him criticism…” Indeed, Cosby suffered a firestorm of criticism from leaders within the black community. Despite this, Cosby has stood by his commentary much to the displeasure of those he criticized. I have heard comments from other black men who have argued much the same as Bill Cosby.

One such man was a substitute teacher back in High School. There was a class discussion and a black student complained about how the system kept black people down. That was when the substitute teacher made a speech. He said that he was tired of the excuses that black people made for not progressing. He said that when the Irish first came to America, they were hated more than a black man was and that a white man would hire a black before he hired an Irishman. Yet, the Irish had broken free from this status and now were judges, politicians, lawyers and doctors. He then asked why is it that everyone else in America can succeed, but blacks are cursed to remain in poverty. He then said that it was because black people have their hands out, waiting for the government to give them something. He told the class that as long as they have their hands out waiting on the government, they would never amount to anything. I was shocked. I had never expected to hear such a thing from the lips of a teacher and to this day he has my respect for telling the truth. Although his name escapes me, I will never forget his words. A people who have their hands out waiting for the government to give them something will never know true freedom.

Until black America wakes up and realizes that the Democrats have pulled the wool over their eyes, they will remain an underclass reminiscent of the boy in the Dickens novel who timidly asked “Please Sir, may I have some more?” One would expect the leaders of the black community to strive to break free from this status, but all of their efforts are directed toward maintaining the status quo. The only salient question is: Why?

The Democrats maintain the system via handouts because it is a block of voters permanently slaved into the party. The black leaders maintain the system in order to obtain wealth and for the status of being the elite of the black community. The NAACP maintains the system in order to maintain relevance in modern society. The “liberation gospel” pastors maintain the system in order to get ahead and to become community leaders. The black community at large maintains the system because they believe that they are owed. Thus, we have a vicious circle that will never end until realization dawns upon enough people at the lowest level and they realize that they are being used.

Am I wrong in my assessment? I don’t think so. Otherwise, the accomplishments of people like Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and Clarence Thomas would be celebrated by the black community rather than derided. That such accomplishments are met with scorn is a travesty. America is the greatest nation that has ever existed in the history of the world. Her highest law guarantees that anyone can be successful and enjoy a good life. All one has to do regardless of race, creed, or national origin, is to pursue your dreams. But in order to do so you must accept responsibility for your own life and stop blaming others for your failures.

It is time to let go of the hate and move forward.

Ward Churchill: Microcosm of the Left

Take a good long look at the photo accompanying this article. That is Professor Ward Churchill (no relation to the great Winston Churchill) in his “revolution” attire. You may remember Professor Churchill from the fallout from his famous “9/11 victims deserved it” stance and subsequent firing from the University of Colorado at Boulder for plagiarism. I use Professor Churchill because he is an excellent representation of the left in microcosm. First, Professor Churchill is a fascist.

For those of you who are unaware, fascism is a phenomenon of the left. Essentially, Hitler and Stalin were two sides of the same coin. The left took the term “fascist” and branded the conservative movement with it in order to silence them, following Stalin’s lead in the U.S.S.R. where he accused his political enemies of being fascists in order to erode their support. Due to the negative connotations regarding Nazis both during and after World War II, this proved a successful tactic. Today, when a leftist wants to silence his or her competition, they simply call them a fascist and then follow with the use of histrionics for emphasis. After all, who would lend an ear to a fascist? As such, fascism is now associated with the right and not the left who originated it.

That the left would prune the family tree in such a manner should not surprise anyone given the status of Joe Lieberman (pictured to the left in blackface courtesy of the liberal left and the Huffington Post) and the Clintons who the radical left was so shocked to learn were complete liars. This brings us around to Churchill who claims to be a member of the Keetoowah Nation of Cherokee Indians, but according to the American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council:

“Churchill perpetuated his fraudulent Indian identity in order to get himself streamlined into tenure and Director of the Ethnic and Indian Studies Department as well to market his plagiarized and revisionist books. Churchill has fraudulently represented himself as a member of the Keetoowah Nation of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma, which he is not. When challenged to show proof of any Indian ancestry he waves an associate membership card that at one time the Keetoowah Nation would give to anyone who would promise to help them.”

That Churchill would so blatantly lie will surprise nobody who is familiar with the left, but why would they do so? Because the truth is irrelevant to the political agenda of the left, that is why they lie, cheat, and deceive. Why do you think that the left was so protective of Bill Clinton when he lied about his affair to the Federal Courts and the American people? Even the National Organization of Women did not take Hillary’s side and condemn the man. Hell, NOW even stood beside him when he was accused of allegedly raping Juanita Broderick. To the left, the truth is only important when you can use it to damage your enemy and clear the impediments to achieving the leftist agenda. This is why Bush is a liar and Clinton is a good guy.

Additionally, the left continuously assaults Christianity and Judaism in order to weaken and destroy the moral fiber of the nation while they support Islam which has a system of situational ethics. These arise from the duality of the Koran and Islam itself. Unless you pinpoint a specific time and situation, one cannot make categorical statements about the religion. As such, contradictions within Islam are accepted. This has a remarkable appeal to the liberal left and so they support it with governmental sanction in defiance of the Constitution in the name of “multiculturalism.”

Churchill also steals the ideas of others and claims them as his own in order to perpetuate his stature. Does anyone recall the Murphy Brown debacle that Dan Quayle got himself into? Quayle said that the fictional character, Murphy Brown, was a poor example to American youth for ridiculing fathers and for deciding to have a child out of wedlock. Quayle took a firestorm of criticism. However, the same critics of Quayle’s “family values” later added them to the Democratic Party’s political platform with a wink and a nod in order to compete against the Republicans. During that election, having once ridiculed the Republicans for taking such a ludicrous and antiquated position on values, the Democrats said that they were for them as well. As the American voter later learned, it is one thing to say something, but quite another to actually live by it.

In addition to his intellectual theft, Churchill also hates the United States. This is where the “9/11 victims deserved it” attitude came from. The liberals feel the same way. According to the liberals, it is because the U.S. completely fouled up foreign policy in the Middle East and the victim’s failure to correct it, is what brought about the attack. Therefore, what you reap is what you sow. The liberal hatred of the U.S. is also why the liberals attack the military, distrust the government, expose secret programs, and cripple the war effort every chance they get. The liberals like to call that patriotism, I call it sedition. If they hate the Republic that much, what do they love? Marxism.

Marxism is the tie that binds them together. This is why they love Castro and Cuba. This is why they orgasm over Venezuela and Chavez. This is why Che Guevara is proudly worn on T shirts and emblazoned on the Cuban flag in one of Obama’s offices. The left loves the power that a Marxist government holds over its people, the power of life and death.

The left is already guilty of over 100 million murders, how many more will it take to quench their bloodlust? In the meantime, they put on a smiley face and pretend to want to help the little guy while they do their dirty work behind closed doors and out of sight.

Finally, Churchill likes to feel smarter than other people by pointing out their so called stupidity. The liberals like to do the same, particularly when they speak about opposition leaders in public office. Take President Bush for example. The left calls him stupid, says that he is lucky to string a sentence together, is a pathological liar, and hires the same kind of people to help him. Now, if we were to take the liberals at their word, what would that say about us as a nation? Who do the liberals think we are to elect such a man? I submit that they think about us in exactly the same fashion. This is also the basis for the nanny government. Obviously, we are too stupid to think for ourselves and require a benevolent dictator to keep us from harm. Who would that dictator be? The liberal left, of course. This is why I fear for our freedoms and why, I believe, the left desperately wants to separate you from your guns.

That there is a socialist aspect to this nation cannot be denied, but it has been placed here with the consent of the American people. The liberal left wants to transition the Federal Government into a fully socialist government and they will gladly abridge your freedoms in order to get it. This is why they must be opposed and why they must not succeed. In fact, I don’t even want you to take my word for it. Investigate it yourself and come to your own conclusions. I think that if you truly love this nation and our system of government, you will see things the way a conservative does.

The Global Climate Crisis

You know, as I grow older I find that I have a greatly diminished capacity for idiots and fools, both of which are currently screaming that we are all going to burn to death from the dreaded atmospheric phenomenon known as “Global Warming.” This kind of knee jerk behavior has happened previously and it was called eugenics. Eugenics was a pseudoscience that purported to remove the harmful DNA from the gene pool by sterilization and homicide. Famous proponents of eugenics were Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler and it was the rage of its day. However, there are millions who were sterilized against their will and murdered who would disagree with Sanger and Hitler’s precepts.

Today, the rage is about global warming and I am forced to wonder, how in the hell can these dullards tell me what the temperature is going to be ten years from now when they can’t even tell me what the weather is going to be next month. Further, the “science” they are using is apparently vastly different from the science that I know. For example, models used to predict global warming have been off by as much as 400%, there was faulty mathematics involved in the famous “hockey stick” data, and finally, the dubious research that has concluded that the sun has no role in global warming. No, I am not joking about the research that declared that the sun has no role in global warming.

What then do the global warming alarmists claim is responsible for the current “crises?” Man. More to the point, our release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by such arcane technologies as breathing, burning coal, and driving to work has created the current “crises.” Aside from the fact that the global mean temperature has ceased to increase years ago, we need to institute a government program the likes of which the world has never seen. It will cost trillions of dollars and we will all have to live green, but government will save the day or at least claim that they have.

Which leads to my next question, why the hell do we want to trust these dolts to be right anyway? The last time we listened to these fools, they told us to not clear the brush in the forest leading to catastrophic fires and destroyed communities. If they can’t get forestry management right what makes you believe that they can manage a global weather system? Personally, I am impressed that they can manage to clothe themselves. Yet the DNC propagandists (the mainstream media for my liberal readers) continue to push this junk science down the throats of the American public.

What disappoints me most of all are the scientists that have whored themselves and falsified the data of their research in order to get the grant money offered by the liberal left in order to perpetuate the global warming myth. Science and politics should never mix in my opinion and those who wouldn’t know a crucible from a gas spectrometer should simply shut their pie holes.

If you want to know what the next great “crisis” is going to be, I will tell you. Mercury poisoning will kill us all. How do I know? Because the compact fluorescent bulbs we are being forced into using all have 3 mg. of mercury in them. Remember, you heard it here first.