When one considers the broad scope of human accomplishment and then looks at our response to politics and the environment one cannot help, but to wonder just what are we thinking? Take the fires burning in
This is the type of thing that drives conservatives crazy. We try to understand the thought process of the liberal mind and quite simply, it is impossible. It is like trying to understand the dream world of the psychotic while he is in the grip of his psychosis. On the one hand, the libs want to protect the forest and keep it natural while combating global warming. On the other, their preferred method burns the forest to the ground and leaves thousands homeless while at the same time emitting more carbon dioxide and thus worsening the global warming crises. That the plan makes no sense in view of its results is irrelevant to anybody who makes the decisions for the liberal environmentalist nut jobs. Truth be told, it is the wise management of the land by the government and sportsman who do more everyday to protect the environment that any of the liberal environmentalist groups. Sportsman who wish to hunt and fish protected lands pay fees in order to do so and these fees are in the billions of dollars. The environmentalists want hunting and fishing stopped and where do the environmentalists plan to get the money to replace the lost revenue? From your pocket dear reader, regardless if you have never hunted or fished on protected lands.
These same environmentalist liberal head cases also want you to use green lighting. As you know, incandescent bulbs consume so much power. Additionally, it will save the planet by combating global warming due to reduced carbon dioxide emissions. What the liberals won’t tell you is that each and every fluorescent bulb you use also has two milligrams of mercury in it. You may recall the expression, “mad as a hatter?” People said that because hatters used mercury in their trade and the brain damage was a permanent result of their livelihood. Therefore, when one of these bulbs break a mist is created laced with mercury for you to breathe. Additionally, millions of these bulbs are destined for the land fill. What will be the effect of so much mercury showing up there and possibly in the water table due to rain washing the pollutants into the ground water? The liberals choose to overlook the pollution caused by their bright ideas in favor “saving” the environment for the future just as they overlook the deforestation caused by their other brilliant plans.
Even better are the millions dead because these same nut jobs had DDT banned. Rachel Carson gets cancer and then goes around looking for a chemical pesticide to blame it on and arrives at the doorstep of DDT. Never mind that sweet Rachel lied about Dr. Albert Schweitzer’s endorsement of her position, when in fact he was diametrically opposed to her position. Yet, there were the left wing nut jobs looking for an environmental cause to gather around and DDT showed up right on time. The fact that these people murdered millions of people in the third world aside, they still proclaim DDT as the doom of the natural world. They say it thins the egg shells of birds, they say it causes cancer, they say it has nearly wiped out entire bird populations, and they say all of this because of the fraudulent research they performed so that they could say these things. That’s right dear reader, the environmentalist nut jobs have never met a lie that they wouldn’t tell. The facts regarding DDT are clear. It is not a carcinogen, it has never thinned the egg shells of birds (in forty years nobody has been able to replicate the experiments which found this result), and the bird populations that were cited as being destroyed by DDT were in fact in decline long before DDT was ever used in the environment.
When one examines the record of these environmentalists, you cannot help, but to think that these people are crazy because their results are 180 degrees opposite from their goals. They say that they want to protect nature, but they end up burning it down. They say that they want to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but they end up creating an even worse environmental disaster with mercury that will prove far deadlier. They say they want to protect man from dangerous chemicals and end up killing millions with malaria. Just how stupid do we have to be to still listen to these people? These fruitcakes have fouled up everything that they have tried to save. It is like a doctor who desperately tries to save the life of his patients, but ends up killing them instead. Worse, people give them prizes for it. Al Gore just won the Nobel Peace Prize for flying all over the world in a private jet telling people that they have to sacrifice their standard of living because of carbon emissions.
I won’t listen to them anymore and I advise you to turn a deaf ear to them as well.