Thursday, May 31, 2007

Identifying the Democrats: Who They Are Part II

When we last looked at this topic I promised to expose the heart of these people and I shall do that now. While one could argue that the Democrats left behind their racist attitudes (as an historical aside, the Democratic Party was vehemently against the abolition of slavery) they would be mistaken. Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States, Political Scientist, and supporter of the Ku Klux Klan said, “The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self preservation… until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, to protect the Southern country.” The quote was added to D.W. Griffith’s film, Birth of a Nation in order to enhance the films racial stance in regard to the Ku Klux Klan. Why is this important? Woodrow Wilson was a Democrat.

While the left assures us that such feelings were left to the distant past, I disagree. Take Senator Robert Byrd from West Virginia for example, he is a “reformed” Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. One would think that the truly reformed would also reform their language, but not Senator Byrd. He refers to certain White House personnel as “white niggers.” I don’t know about you, but if I were a reformed hate monger I would have eliminated the “n” world from my vocabulary. Particularly if I had been at the top of a white supremacist organization, but Senator Byrd is not alone in his feelings.

Senator Joe Biden declared Barak Obama an “Articulate and clean” black man. In fact, his exact words were, ““I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” he said. “I mean, that’s a storybook, man.” One wonders if Obama is the first what does that say about Sharpton and Jesse Jackson? Senator Biden’s comment leaves one to wonder why he would say that. Does he mean to imply that normally African Americans are usually dirty and inarticulate? Does racism swirl about the heart of the Democrats? The Democrats certainly do not think so. The blog, Jack and Jill Politics commented on a political cartoon which highlighted Hillary Clinton’s attempt to ape African Americans. The blog said:

“(I) just don't even know what to say about this cartoon by Chris Muir who's popular among the right wing bloggers and papers (h/t John Swift).It's almost like it's no longer as shocking to my system as it used to be. It's so gratuitous, racist and insulting, it's hard to know where to start breaking it down and explaining the many ways in which putting politicians in blackface and using pigeon English is not ok.”

What is interesting here is that the blog glosses over Hillary Clinton’s behavior and focuses on the right, but what did Hillary do to earn attention in the cartoon? Mrs. Clinton adopted a fake Southern accent, spoke as if she were a black woman with experience on the plantation to include the attendant pigeon English words and accent, and directly linked the Republicans to the slave masters. What did Jack and Jill Politics have to say about that? Not a damned thing. If the blogger is so upset by, “putting politicians in blackface,” then I wonder how she would feel about democratic supporters placing Joe Liebermann in black face with Bill Clinton? The photo of Bill Clinton and Senator Joe Liebermann was doctored to put Liebermann in a bad light in order to gain a political advantage over him. Such an act is not only abhorrent, but also anti-Semitic and racist.

Why would a progressive, forward thinking, loving, democrat try to paint Liebermann in blackface if it were not to stir up racial feelings? It was done because Liebermann was no longer a Democrat as he had lost the primary election and he was winning against Ned Lamont who was running as a Democrat. So you see, the Democrats eat their own. But wait! There is a hell of a lot more! The Democrats response to the right has been filled with vitriol and racial hatred. Take Michelle Malkin for example, the comments made by the rank and file of the left are reminiscent of the Nazi party. Consider the following comments made about Malkin:

Why exactly does this large toothed educated female wog believe that she will be treated as white when God chose to make her yellow? Even her political allies see her as nothing more than a trained monkey coached into saying a few simple racial truths that would be politically damaging if put into the mouths of a white man? Her hatred for her fellow wogs comes from an inability to accept that God did not make her a European and that God chose to make her a woman.”

While the comment came from the liberal rank and file, it is in concert with the feelings of Clinton, Biden, Byrd, et al. Hard to believe? Look at how the Democrats treated Al Sharpton when he ran for president. Look at what they said about the first black woman Secretary of State or the first black male Secretary of State. Compare the diversity of the Clinton administration to that of the current President and you will find that Republicans have the most diverse White House administration in the history of the United States. Look at the upper echelons of the Democratic Party and the first thing you have to ask yourself is: Where are the people of color? Are not the Democrats the party of the people? Don’t the Democrats promote diversity? I will answer that question for you, they are for diversity in theory, but in practice if you want to be judged on your individual merits you need to be a Republican.

While it is true that one liberal blogger spoke out against the blatant racism of the rank and file, he quickly retreated and said that he would take up the fight when the right did. I suppose that he is unaware of the diversity of the current administration or that Lynn Swann received the full support of the Republican Party, and the Republicans were the abolitionist party. However, it could also be that he is without a spine. Given the liberal urge to flee Iraq, the latter explanation is probably correct. Regardless, when one recognizes that evil is being committed then one has the responsibility to fight it and racism is an evil. It is curious to me that the minorities who support the Democrats have never caught on to this darkness in the Democratic Party or if they have they certainly forgive it. The exclusion to that rule was Don Imus.

Imus thought he was black too and that gave him the right to call the Rutgers ladies basketball team a bunch of "nappy headed ho's" on his morning radio show. That Imus would do this after the Michael Richards melt down (also a liberal) is astounding, but I believe that he felt that his status as a liberal excluded him from harm. Thankfully, it did not, but I have yet to see the same standard applied directly to the Democratic Party and its members.

In part III, we will explore the patriotism of the left.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Identifying the Democrats: Who They Are Part I

Arrogance, corruption, lies, and bloodshed are all relevant terms when speaking of the liberal left. In the past one-hundred years the left has been responsible for the slaughter of well over 100 million people. Yet the most terrible thing that one can be called is a fascist, a member of those who were responsible for the butchery of 6 million people. That equates to 16.6 times the killing by the kind hearted folks of the left bringing about a new social order and they are a long way from achieving this goal.

While the left would have you believe that it is the right you need to fear, it is in truth the left you need to watch. Supported by Soviet Russia in the 1960’s, the new left was going to forge the world into a Shamballa of socialist virtue, very similar to the Soviet paradise found in the thousands of Gulags. The young, fresh voices of the day were spouting Lenin and Mao at every opportunity and attempting to recruit new members in between drunken/doped out, debauchery. From these halcyon days come the emergence of the Weather Underground, Black Panthers, Black Liberation Army, and any number of other various and sundry socially cognizant organizations attempting to leave their mark upon the world.

Can anyone truly forget Kathy Boudin, scion of the liberal left and her playful antics that resulted in armed robbery and the murder of police officers? Ah, the exuberance of youth. Thank God she was not forgotten by the socially adept left while she served her prison time. The left will be glad to know that she intends to start a program for helping inmates with AIDS cope with the affliction, co founded with her fellow parasite Judy Clark. Both of these convicts are supported by the Maoist International Movement, underscoring the point that communists do not forget their own. As an interesting aside, the Maoist International Movement was founded by the liberal professors of Harvard University and Radcliffe University. No doubt that Harvard and Radcliffe are very proud of their faculty’s achievement. Anyway, I certainly hope that Ms. Boudin does not need to murder anybody to help her achieve her social programs goals because she has proven herself to be a vicious and effective killer, having previously lulled police into a death trap. Still, it is good to know that prison cannot change your liberal values.

Then there is that icon of social consciousness, Abbie Hoffman. In addition to attempting to overthrow the government of the United States, Abbie was vehemently opposed to the war in Vietnam. The fact that the USSR funded the anti-war movement notwithstanding, you may recall a protest in Washington with the loud mouthed young man in an American flag shirt shouting obscenities on the mall? If not, rent the movie “Forest Gump” and you can see a reenactment. That was Abbie. Free spirited and fun loving, he killed himself in 1989. I guess he couldn’t deal with being an irrelevant middle aged man. That Mr. Hoffman has had more of an impact on the left since his suicide than he had in life is ironic indeed. One writer even reminisces about the good old days. What she does not mention are the Federal buildings being bombed, the police officers being murdered, banks being robbed, and the National Guard armories that were raided for weapons and ammunition for the purpose of violently overthrowing the Federal Government. These parasites and their psychotic friends would violate the law robbing and killing into the eighties in order to bring about social justice.

Not all of those who believed as the more militant radicals did sought to overtly violate the law or seek the violent overthrow of the U.S. government. This is not because they did not seek the same radical liberal utopia, but because they knew that they could not win. They solved their dilemma by entering into the world of politics. They sought public office in an effort to change the government into the radical lefts version of a social paradise from the inside. Thus began the infiltration of the Democratic Party.

The Democrats of today and of yesteryear have nothing in common except the name. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Jack Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson would not recognize their own political party today. I personally believe that if they knew what their party had become, they would be doing about 2500 rpm in their graves. If that is the case, then who are the Democrats today? The cohorts of the radical left who blew up Federal buildings, murdered police officers, and raided National Guard Armories and founded communist organizations hostile toward America and capitalism.

Next time, we will explore the heart of the Democratic Party.

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

By the Pricking of My Thumb, Something Wicked This Way Comes


When you examine the past, you can usually predict the future. This is because human beings are creatures of habit and we rarely, if ever, change our ways. There is great evil stalking the world today. In fact, it has been stalking man for thousands of years, but we don’t note it until it threatens to overtake us all. The last time we decided to fight it was December of 1941 and the time is nearing when we shall have to take up arms against it again. Unfortunately, the presence of evil in the world has grown so strong that we are reaching a point where we will not be guaranteed victory.

The clarions of warning have been sounded and yet we sit still. Perhaps we believe that if we don’t choose to see it for what it is then evil will pass us by, but such is never the case with that enemy. We have attempted to negotiate with it in the past and only increased its bloodlust while we sat by and wrung our hands in worry. Not until we brought forth the force of arms were we able to subdue it and yet we still expect to talk our way out of the inevitable.

If the situation in the world today were not so grim, our response to our enemy would be amusing, like a child whistling in the dark to stave off monsters. Europe has fallen into apathy and its military muscle has atrophied severely, communism has reared its ugly head once again in South America and has begun to heavily arm itself, North Korea has crude nuclear weapons and their beloved leader is a nutcase, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and its president is besieged by extremists, Iran is moving toward acquiring thermonuclear weapons, and terrorists are looking for an even grander strike than what occurred on September 11, 2001. Worse, several suitcase nukes are unaccounted for in the former Soviet arsenal according to Vladimir Volfovich Zhirinovsky, the Russian communist hardliner who has a reputation for telling the truth. The obvious question is why would Zhirinovsky not keep this a state secret? Because if one of these weapons were detonated in a U.S. city, the current Russian regime could not be blamed and targeted for a retaliatory nuclear strike, that’s why.

As if things were not bad enough, the radical Muslim extremists would love nothing better than to roll time back one thousand years and to destroy the West so that they could establish an Islamic empire ruled by Sharia law. Indeed, they have already defeated Israel on the battlefield with the aid of Europe and the United Nations and accomplished a strike on the United States with military precision using guerilla operatives. It is truly unfortunate that only Australia sees the real danger from this quarter while Europe is blind to it and actively supports those who seek to convert the world to radical Islam. One would think that their experience with the Nazis would have given them a leg up on recognizing its reemergence, but no.

When America is finally forced into a corner and must either fight or perish, where will our allies be? France, Germany, and Spain have deserted us in the Iraq war. Will they come to our aid when our need is dire? In truth, I just don’t know. Europe is like a giant, stately oak, but its apparent strength is an illusion. It is rotten at its core and will fall if too severely pushed. As much as I am reluctant to admit it, we may find ourselves alone in the fight. As I said before, we are approaching a point where victory is not assured.

So what are our leaders doing to prepare us for the greatest conflict man has ever faced? Not much of anything really. In fact, it appears the Democrats are working with our enemies to insure our destruction at times. I truly hope that they do so out of stupidity and not cooperation, but I just don’t know what is in their hearts and it really is looking like they have more in common with Josef Stalin than our founding fathers. The Republicans are little better, abandoning conservative values and back stabbing the president whenever it is politically expedient to do so. Their failure to abide by principals etched in the foundations of our nation is gravely disturbing, to say the least.

That leaves us with the last line of defense, the citizens. When alliances and governments fail, the citizen is the last line of defense for the people of a nation. Father Malachi Martin said that when one acknowledges the presence of evil then one has accepted responsibility for fighting it. I have shown you the fingerprints of evil in the world today. What are you going do about it?